The New Conservative Blogs Central Is Live

The New Site Is Up And Running!!!

You can be registered and posting on the new site in however long it takes you to type in your user name, password and then click a conformation email...


Now don't be stubborn, and embrace the change. This site will go away soon; so gather up you little bit of crap and move on over there.

Let's see if I am better at rolling out a site than Obama?

Conservative Blogs Central


I have been killing myself trying to get this thing up and going for you all, and I know you are going to like it once you get used to it.

So please start moving your operation over there...

I am tired of putting money the hip pockets of the Obama supporting commies at Google by blogging on their platform.

  • It will auto post to everything the old CBC does right now, but this one sends its feed to a few other places.
  • I made the stats available at the top of the blog, so that you can click on it and watch it grow.
  • I will be phasing out this blog over the next couple of months - so get over there and register.
  • Your posts will have your pic at the bottom (if you fill out your profile with a description)
Bear with me while I get everything move from here to there.

And let me know if you have any trouble getting setup, or any suggestions...

Tuesday, December 4

The Constitutionist Updated: Obama is not a natural born citizen

I am updating this post as this news directly ties in with The-Constitutiionist

This is a must read and please be sure to read this all the way through. This work is becoming more relevant with each passing day. 

Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen!

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/eligibility-challenge-returns-to-haunt-florida/

 'Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States'

A lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s presence on the 2012 presidential election ballot because of questions over his constitutional eligibility that was thrown out by a judge who earlier determined it wasn’t timely has returned to haunt election officials in the state with a request that the Obama victory results be quashed.

“Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States, and its Constitution, which plaintiff must protect and defend by oath,” according to the complaint, which was delivered to Secretary of State Ken Detzner today.

The case earlier this year was dismissed by Circuit Judge Terry Lewis, who said Obama’s eligibility could not be challenged at that time because under Florida election law, technically, Obama hadn’t been nominated to the position.

As WND reported, Michael Voeltz, who identifies himself as “a registered member of the Democratic Party, voter and taxpayer in Broward County,” had challenged Obama’s eligibility, arguing that the “natural born citizen” clause was rightly understood in historical context to mean a child not only born in the U.S., but born to two American-citizen parents, so as not to have divided loyalties. Obama, however, readily admits to being born a dual citizen because of his father’s British citizenship.

In his decision then, Lewis noted that the United States Supreme Court has concluded that “every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.”

However, attorney Larry Klayman, who is representing Voeltz, said, “The judge equated being a ‘citizen’ with a ‘natural born citizen’ and cited no authority to conclude the two terms are the same. He quotes other state’s cases, where judges reached that conclusion, but that’s not precedent for him. What other courts said in lower cases means nothing to him.”

Klayman also had been concerned that the judge determined the burden of proof that Obama is ineligible fell on Voeltz – but then refused to authorize discovery in the case which could have confirmed that eligibility status.

“How can you say we have the burden of proof, then not allow discovery?” Klayman asked. “He says we have burden, but doesn’t allow us to meet it.”

And he said Voeltz has standing to bring the case, under Florida law.
Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve? Here’s WND’s complete archive of news reports on the issue

The original case sought to exclude Obama from the 2012 ballot. Klayman and Voeltz claimed that Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, because he was born a British subject.

The case cited the evidence produced by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s special investigative unit, which has asserted that the birth documentation from Hawaii that Obama claimed was “proof positive” of his Hawaiian birth is not real.

And Florida law provides that anyone qualified to vote in an election may challenge a candidate based on ‘ineligibility of the successful candidate for the nomination or office in dispute.”
Now the new complaint explains the challenge to Obama’s eligibility is “within the proper time frame and venue established by the ‘contest of election’ statutes of Florida.”

“Plaintiff asserts that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States because he was born a British subject of a British subject father, Barack Obama Sr., who was married to the mother of Barack H. Obama at the time…,” it explains.

“Barack Obama Sr., a citizen of the British colony of Kenya, and his children, were subject to the operation of the British Nationality Act of 1948. By the operation of Part 1 Section 1 of that Act, Barack Hussein Obama became a British subject, upon birth to a British subject father. It is not known whether he has lost that birth allegiance to the British crown.”

And, according to the complaint, the natural born citizen clause specifically was inserted to address the possibility of foreign influence at the highest levels of the U.S. government, in the White House. “Law of Nations defines the term of art ‘natural born citizen’ as one born in the country [to] parents who are that country’s citizens.

“Plaintiff Michael C. Voeltz has standing, as a Florida voter, and taxpayer, to challenge the ‘nomination or election of any person to office’ based on the winning candidates’ eligibility for the office sought. … The state of Florida has chosen, by popular election, the electors for Defendant Barack Hussein Obama to be president … Plaintiff has fulfilled all aspects of the Florida election statutes for this challenge of eligibility, as to timing, venue, and indispensable parties.”

The case notes that the complaint is being filed before the Florida electors meet to cast their vote in the Electoral College, a procedure that affirms the popular vote choice made Nov. 6.
The case asks the Florida Elections Canvassing Commission to decertify the Florida General Election upon a “judicial determination of the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as president … and to certify the electors for Mitt Romney as the winner.”

Klayman has argued that since Obama, by his own admission, was not born to two citizen parents, he is not a “natural born citizen” and, therefore, is ineligible to be a candidate on the state’s election ballot.

Florida’s election statutes provide broad protections for voters to ensure that the integrity of the election system is beyond reproach. One of the laws allows voters to challenge the nomination of a candidate who is not eligible for the office he is seeking.

Update ends here

****************

This is a work I believe in or I would not be doing this.

If you are needing a great Christmas, holiday gift, please consider The-Constitutionist!
 
This ebook is the best bang for your hard earned U.S. dollars, which will be rapidly be losing  more value now the Obama has stolen and bribed himself into a second term as President. I normally do not push for folks to buy things... Well, ceegars, beer, whiskey and guns are always great things to buy.  Bob Gard's ebook is an exception and worthy of your consideration for purchase.This well researched volume is deeply relevant to our Republic's history and the current President, who is NOT a natural born citizen. 

Let me remind all of you that Obama is not, and will NEVER be my President.
--------------------------------------------
This next post will remain at the top for quite some time. I have been working on this for way too long and since we are now post election, the relevancy of this next feed will be of paramount importance. Obama's re-election has assured the importance of this work for now and very far into the future. It also has importance to the past history of the United States going back to the earliest, tumultuous days of our country's birth.

In the run up to the 2012 Presidential election much was made over whether Obama was born in the United States and more importantly whether he is a legally, natural born citizen,  therefore legally qualified to be POTUS. While much was made about the first point, it is the second point that I feel requires much more investigation, research and exposure based upon the truth from said research and the facts. Natural born citizen goes way beyond the 'birther controversy' and there is nothing wrong with the birther story but it lacked substance and traction. Now we been blessed with both, thanks to Bob Gard and his ebook The Constitutionist.

I was fortunate enough to receive one of the first copies of this outstanding ebook a few months back. It would have been better if the release could have come about eight months BEFORE the election but it did not. I have read the entire ebook and it is a massive work. The Reviewers Guide is very important. It will guide you to and and through critical entries, chapters and terminology that will be encountered throughout this work. As an ebook it can be a bit of a challenge to read but once you start the ebook, it becomes a fascinating story of the Continental Congress and Constitutional Convention. It does not matter if you are a scholar of American history or a concerned patriot. This ebook will open your mind and eyes as to how illegal Barack Obama is and how he is not a natural born citizen. It will also show how most past President's have trampled over and under our Constitution.

The nature of this work was disclosed to me over a year and half ago. I knew nothing about the author and just a small amount of information about the depth of research was shared with me. I was sworn to absolute secrecy and confidentiality. I was told that the author had copies of books that were read by Jefferson, Washington and others of this foundational generation. Books that are known to be over four hundred years old. I have read many books on the Birth of our nation and so much that was lost to me, came roaring back, to the point that I had tears in my eyes. Why, you might asked could I be so historically and emotionally moved? For love of country, the gift of wisdom and warning that the Founding Fathers gave us with our Constitution. I do know and happen to be friends with the editor.

Remember, I knew virtually nothing about this book before I received my copy. It was not until AFTER I had read most of the ebook when I was approached to help with the distribution of this book over the summer and let me clear, the hour was very late for the ebook's release. When you read through the Conservative Blockade Section at The-Constitutionist.com much of the why and who's will become painfully clear.

Two books that I had previously read come to mind and I beg Mr.Gard's forgiveness in mentioning them. Not to distract from his excellent work but to weave a common path of others warning us about what we could lose, our FREEDOM, if we did not guard the Constitution up to the point of giving our very lives for this most sacred document.

The two books are: The Rewriting of America's History by Catherine Millard, published in 1991. This is not a perfect book but is very memorable for describing how much our history is being rewritten in attempts to make us more international and not uniquely American. The next book is Founding Brothers by Joseph J.Ellis. This book is much more researched and goes into some excellent detail on those who were part of the "Revolutionary Generation" and those who influenced these wise men, and women

The term natural born citizen evokes many images, quite a few definitions and please understand that much of what you are about to read is the culmination of two plus years of research encompassing a lifetime of love for our beloved Founding Fathers, our Constitution and Republic by the author, Bob Gard

Here is just a hint from the prologue in The-Constitutionist.com:
" Back then our schools were flush with liberals. One of my initial attacks on liberal revisionist history was directed at my eighth grade civics teacher when he taught that John Jay’s “natural born Citizen,” which found its way into the presidential eligibility clause by the powerful influence of his best friend George Washington, meant native born Citizen. I lectured my teacher that common sense should have indicated that natural-born and native-born were not equivalents because the framers obviously considered them different by carefully choosing natural-born over native-born for the presidency. I told the teacher that anyone who employed common sense, logic and reason should come to the conclusion that natural-born meant a person born on American soil of two American citizen parents. That did not go over so well.

We argued for days. He won through the power of his position. I lost through the weakness of mine. I never forgot the argument. I dreamed of proving my position someday. That day has come. I did not discover a note in John Jay’s handwriting that revealed his specific definition for the term he used in his famous July 25, 1787 letter to Washington urging the inclusion of the term in the presidential eligibility clause of the Constitution. I did the next best thing. I amassed so much corroborative, correlative, and circumstantial information pointing to the true meaning—a citizen born in an American state of two American citizens—that I am sure that the proof can only be described as beyond a reasonable doubt. Those with an agenda will deny its strength but I guarantee they will not fight with facts. Political correctness and name-calling will be their shield and sword."


Native born citizen usually evokes the same definitions, standards and images as Natural born citizen. They should not and they are not the same. The two terms are as different as night and day, as if it were so simple. I do not see myself as a great scholar nor am I of supreme intellect. What I do have is an intense intellect of common sense and the gift of vision and being able to apply to the past, the present and future. My life was changed forever when I just happened to take one American History Revolutionary War class in college taught by one Dr.Nash. Then came American Military History from 1776-1855 taught by one Dr. Mann. The rest, as they, say is history. AMERICAN and CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY.

The Constitutionist
This is an ebook that can and will make a difference in the direction and history of the United States.

"ON GARD, OBAMA, YOU ARE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, WHICH I WILL PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT."

Purchase a copy and the link is below. If you contact me through the comments and are truly interested but are unable to afford a copy I will see what might be done to get you one. NO promises and you must prove to me you SERIOUSLY want a copy to read. NO trolls or slaggards.

Welcome to The Constitutionist 


Tags: The Constitutionist, Barack Obama, not elegible, not natural born, To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the Patriot's Corner. Thanks!

1 comment:

  1. Bob Gard is an unfortunate example that volume cannot redeem a premise which is fundamentally flawed. His 1722 page book is worthless, not because it isn't long enough, but because the flaws of his premise begin on page one. No matter how many pages he adds, the flaw persists. You cannot fix a poisoned well by dumping more water in it.

    I am not an expert on Constitutional law, and so I must defer to expertise. Considering that Bob Gard, for all his volume, has not been published or reviewed in any reputable legal journal, has not been peer reviewed, has not been cited by any recognized expert, and cannot even manage to sell his book in any significant volume, leads me to believe, and rightly so apparently, that no real expert on the subject regards his speculative pulp to be worthy of consideration.

    His flawed premise also goes against every recognized authority on the subject. Indeed he contradicts even the research branch of the Library of Congress, the entity upon which the legislative branch of our government does rely for accurate and timely information on such subjects.

    This combined with the lack of any apparent credentials of his own (at least that I can find and verify) leads any reasonable person to conclude that Mr. Gard is simply another obsessed birther with too much time on his hands, and with a much greater belief in his own "expertise" than his spurious book warrants, despite it's volume.

    In short, Bob Gard's writings are an excellent example of how wasted space is no less wasted, no matter how much you increase the volume.

    ReplyDelete

Click Here For "CBC News"

Back to TOP