Monday, May 6

Bill Ayers Defends Weather Underground Bombings

Bill Ayers Says There Is No Equivalence Between Weather Underground Bombs and Boston Marathon Bombs

Bill Ayers...the POS who is now a college professor, once bombed several government buildings in protest of wars. He says all he did was destroy some property. On October 20, 1981 in Nanuet, New York, the group robbed a Brinks armored truck containing $1.6 million. The robbery was violent, resulting in the murders of two police officers and a security guard.

So I would say it was more than just "destruction of property." Why this dirt bag even continues to enjoy the sun on his worthless hide is beyond me. Below are his own words as quoted from The Blaze. And remember, it was in his living room that 0bama's political rise to the presidency was formed.

According to the Akron Beacon Journal Online, Ayers responded by saying there is “no relationship at all” between the acts, and even defended his decisions.


“How different is the shooting in Connecticut from shooting at a hunting range?” the Weather Underground co-founder reportedly replied. “Just because they use the same thing, there’s no relationship at all.”
Ayers was a keynote speaker at the commemoration of the National Guard shootings at Kent State this weekend, and was asked the question after his remarks.
The Beacon Journal’s Jim Mackinnon continues:
The United States is the most violent country that has ever been created, Ayers said.
U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., committed daily war crimes in Vietnam “and I get asked about violence when what I did was some destruction of property to issue a scream and cry against an illegal war in which 6,000 people a week are being killed,” Ayers said. “Six thousand a week being killed and I destroyed some property. Show me the equivalence. You should ask John McCain that question … I’m against violence.”
“To conflate a group of fundamentalist people [in Boston] who are nihilistic in some way with a group of people who spent their lives trying to oppose the murder of 6,000 people a week … and still the killing went on. And still the killing went on. What would you have done?” Ayers said. “There’s no equivalence [with Boston]. Property damage. That’s what we did.” [Emphasis added]
 

This isn’t the first time Ayers has defended his role in the Weather Underground. In 2001 he said: “I don’t regret setting bombs…I feel we didn’t do enough.”
Both Hillary Clinton and John McCain noted President Obama’s connections to the radical in their presidential campaigns.


The Beacon Journal has more on Ayers’ remarks. Apparently he continued to attack John McCain, and spoke of the three friends he lost:
In his talk to the crowd, Ayers mentioned that in 1970, he lost three friends in the Weather Underground, including his lover, Diana Oughton. He did not explain in his talk how they died – they were killed when nail bombs they were making in a Greenwich Village townhouse blew up.
Telling the crowd the circumstances of those deaths would have been “inappropriate,” Ayers said afterward. “Everybody here knows,” he said.
Authorities said the bombs were intended to be used at a dance at the Fort Dix Army base in New Jersey.
“No one knows for sure but I think they were. And had they carried it out it would have been a catastrophe,” Ayers said. “But they didn’t and it didn’t happen. But what did happen is, on that same day John McCain murdered civilians. Do we have any responsibility for that? Should there be any reconciliation for that? Should he tell the truth about it?”



2 comments:

Thomas Carter said...

Defending the indefensible. Let's call "Up" "Down" and "Down", "Up"! Let's call black, white and white, black. Let us call that which is evil, good and that which is good, evil! Let's pretend we do not hear the protests and do hear only agreement. Let our henchmen in the news media declare the same and that will marginalize our opposition.

Do you think this is a new tactic of the LIARS and those who follow the LIARS?

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" ~Isaiah 5:20, written around 700 years before the birth of Christ.

The Conservative Wife said...

You are exactly right, Thomas Carter. Nothing new under the sun.

RINO Blog Watch (Blog)

RINO Forum - User Submitted News

RINO Forum - Elections

Recent Posts

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Views (since Blogger started counting)

Blog Archives

Content.ad - Widget 13

Click Here To Become A Conservative Blogs Central Blogger

Back to TOP