Some are More Equal than Others
As a retired FBI Agent, I can state unequivocally that in
the many cases I investigated and presented to the United States Attorney for
prosecution, I never once told the USA what to do with the case. Several of my
retired friends have assured me they had similar experiences. Somewhere, there
probably is an ex-Agent who will tell you he made such a decision himself on
behalf of the USA; stranger things have happened. But the decision as to
whether to prosecute a case lies entirely within the purview of the USA or an
Assistant USA—or the Attorney General of the United States--NOT the FBI.
Some Agents have tried to persuade the USA to prosecute a
case that they felt strongly about, mostly with limited success. However, if
the Agent is unable to prove any of the elements of the crime as set out in the
United States Code of Criminal Justice, then the matter is dropped—period.
It is difficult to imagine a bona fide Agent setting out in
a report for the prosecution all the elements of the crime, stating
affirmatively that the subject had violated each and every element of that
crime—and then averring that it does not rise to the level of a prosecutable
case. He has just assured his listeners of the obverse, and now he says he does
not recommend prosecution. That is insane.
I have heard that COMEY might have chosen this route so that
the people could be apprised of the facts, because a lengthy Grand Jury might
prolong indictment until after the election. Fine. That is one way of doing it.
But why not do the right thing and present the evidence to Attorney General
LORETTA LYNCH? If she refused to prosecute or to immediately put the evidence
before a Grand Jury, COMEY should have tendered his resignation, with an even
fuller explanation that he is compelled to resign because of inaction on the
part of the Attorney General in prosecuting a very viable case. By his failure
to pursue this prosecution vigorously, COMEY soiled the reputation of the FBI
and American justice in general.
The Director tried to assure anyone who would listen that
the decision rendered in this matter was not to be construed as favorable to
the rich and powerful—that there is not another system of justice that applies to
the poor and unimportant. Were you reassured by that statement? Neither was I.
Confidence in our system of jurisprudence has been steadily
eroding since the administration of President Bill Clinton. The Director of the
FBI made this decision in the matter of Hillary Clinton’s misuse of her email
while serving as Secretary of State so that the Attorney General would not have
to. That she would have made the same decision is little doubted. Taking it out
of her hands saved Ms. LYNCH and the President from embarrassment and
criticism. I believe the result will be a further hastening of the loss of
confidence that the American people feel they can place in the very system that
is ostensibly there to protect them.
No comments:
Post a Comment