Is House action on Obamacare
Unreasonable?
President Obama and most members of the back-alley media (I
call them that because the mugging they are giving to the American people
should only be done in that venue) are quick to point out that Obama won the
presidency in 2012, and the primary message of his campaign was his
determination to implement the Affordable Care Act. Ergo, the House of Representatives refusal to
accept and fund Obamacare is a rejection of the will of the people, as voiced
in the Presidential election of 2012.
I’m certain they have only forgotten the results of the
elections of 2010, when the Progressives took an old fashioned drubbing in the
House of Representatives, where the essential thrust of that election was defunding Obamacare. So . . . For the Senate and President now to
keep pressing for the implementation of the (Un) Affordable Care Act, is this
not a rejection of the votes cast by multiplied millions in opposition to a
program that a majority of Americans detest?
One other minor detail I would point out to Progressives who
are so righteously indignant that the conservative house has the temerity to
oppose President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid:
The Constitution—I know, we conservatives just insist upon
citing that hateful, outdated document from time to time—established the rule that all
bills authorizing the expenditure of Federal monies must originate in the House
of Representatives. Unfortunately for President Obama, implementing the
(Un) Affordable Care Act will cost a great deal of money and will require the
appropriation of boatloads of money (that we don’t have) in order to fund
it. Any bill calling for the
appropriation of that money must originate in the House of Representatives—currently
ruled by a Republican majority. It is
inconvenient for the Progressives to be reminded that the (Un) Affordable Care Act
was approved without a single Republican vote, without a single line in that
document having been authored by anyone who even comprehends the meaning of the
word ‘conservative’. Indeed, it was the highly
unethical way in which that ill-conceived act was passed that contributed
mightily to the election in 2010 of Tea Party members that the Progressives love
so much to hate.
If President Obama is convinced that his election was
incontrovertible proof that the people of America desired the implementation of
Obamacare, the Tea Party members in the House of Representatives are equally
certain that they were elected by a majority of people with an over-weaning
desire to STOP this law in its tracks.
The division of powers our Founders built into the
Constitution was for the specific purpose of keeping a single Party or
individual from running roughshod over the opposition—as the Progressives
obviously intend to do, come Hell or high water. To paraphrase Admiral David Farragut’s famous
line, “Damn public opinion of Obamacare—full speed ahead!”
Meanwhile, Tea Party members of the House of Representatives are simply
doing what the people who elected them sent them there to do—use any legal,
ethical and moral means at their disposal to defund, depose, and in any way
feasible STOP the (Un) Affordable Care Act.
1 comment:
I no longer have any delusions about Obama's agenda for America. How about you? http://snafutoon.com
Post a Comment