Apples to Oranges: Rethinking the U.S. and Nordic Economic Models

 🍎🇺🇸 Apples to Oranges: Rethinking the U.S. and Nordic Economic Models

In the swirl of economic debates, few comparisons stir more confusion than the one between the United States and the Nordic countries—Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. Too often, these discussions pit capitalism against socialism, freedom against control. But that’s a false binary. Comparing the American and Nordic models isn’t about choosing apples over oranges—it’s about understanding the orchard and the soil that makes each tree grow.

💼 Capitalism with a Caveat

America’s economy is rooted in capitalism: private ownership, competitive markets, and individual enterprise. It’s a system that rewards innovation and ambition, and it’s produced staggering wealth and technological breakthroughs. But it also comes with trade-offs. Healthcare is privatized and costly. Higher education can saddle families with decades of debt. Social safety nets are uneven, and trust in government is often low—especially when corruption scandals and opaque decision-making erode public confidence.

🧭 Nordic Social Democracy: Not Pure Socialism

Nordic countries operate under a model of social democracy, not socialism. They blend free-market capitalism with universal public services—healthcare, education, childcare, and elder care. Private businesses thrive, but no one is left behind.

To fund this, Nordic countries rely on high and often regressive taxes—including steep value-added taxes (VAT) that apply to everyone, regardless of income. These taxes hit lower-income households harder, but they’re offset by generous benefits: free college, universal healthcare, subsidized childcare, and strong pensions. In short, the system works because people see their taxes returned in tangible, life-enhancing ways.

And here’s the key difference: Nordic governments are consistently ranked among the least corrupt in the world. Transparency is built into their institutions. Public officials are held accountable. Citizens trust that their taxes are used wisely—and that trust fuels a virtuous cycle of civic engagement and policy stability.

🧠 Mindset Matters More Than Model

America doesn’t need to become Sweden to adopt universal healthcare or tuition-free college. It doesn’t need to abandon capitalism to build a stronger safety net. What it needs is a shift in mindset: a willingness to trust institutions, demand transparency, and invest in the common good.

If Americans embraced the idea that government can be a trustworthy steward—transparent, accountable, and responsive—then policies like universal healthcare and free education become not only possible, but practical. The barrier isn’t economic—it’s emotional and cultural.

🕊️ Toward a More Balanced Orchard

It’s time to stop comparing apples to oranges—and start cultivating a more balanced orchard. The U.S. can remain a beacon of innovation and enterprise while learning from Nordic models of equity and care. The path forward isn’t about choosing one system over another. It’s about blending the best of both, rooted in trust, transparency, and a shared commitment to human dignity.

Reaching the Point of No Return

Reaching the Point of No Return

We are rapidly approaching a point of no return in American politics. Never have there been such radical differences in the direction that the separate parties are attempting to lead us.       

The secular humanists—you may prefer ‘progressives’, ‘liberals’ or ‘Democrats’, but henceforth I intend to call them just what they are; Secular Humanists—desire to lead our country away from the foundation laid by our forefathers. That foundation had a basis in English common law, bolstered by the Judeo-Christian ethos. It distinctly delineated right from wrong and suggested that its citizenry be gently taught to freely and voluntarily go beyond simple obedience of those laws so as to not infringe upon the rights of others.

Read this next part slowly, because I believe it is one of the fundamentals of our Constitution: Freedoms never experienced by any civilization from the beginning of time were deliberately provided in our founding document. Why? Was it because the founders believed that man is inherently good and continuing day by day to get better? No, I don’t think the founding fathers were of that opinion. Those freedoms were set in place with the firm belief that the people of America would never purposely choose to separate themselves from the beneficence of a loving God nor reject His easily understood rules for the conduct of a civilized society. They rightly believed to do so would be the epitome of folly.

For close to two hundred years, that prophecy held mostly true. However, something happened in the sixties that started first a slow, almost indiscernible erosion of God’s authority and the rule of law. That erosion was slowed temporarily in the eighties, but then rapidly picked up speed again in the nineties and continues until it threatens to sweep away everything good, honest and worthwhile in its path.

The enemy of our society, the republican form of governance and of capitalism itself is—Secular Humanism.

 

Theories

by Mark A. Cohen

Written : Aug. 21, 2012

Rich DeVos, a co-founder of Amway, speaking to a group of young people, once said that as we travel, we “…find people who don’t believe that people should be rewarded in direct proportion to the effort they put forth. They think that all people should be treated equally like in the socialistic or the Communistic governments. And what that means is that everybody should be equal. What they really mean to say is that everybody should be equally poor – because that’s about where they stand… And they’re telling me that that system’s the wonderful one.” He then quoted someone who told him, ‘Your theories are all wrong.’ To which Mr. DeVos replied to his audience, “And all I can say to the boys with the theories is, ‘Friend, I’m not talkin’ theory.’”

What Rich DeVos tried to convey was that while capitalism isn’t perfect, it has a proven track record. Our system has provided more for people than the entire socialist and Communist countries ever did – put together. Is that a statistic I can quantify? No. But over hundreds of years it provided for people while Communism, in its short history has failed millions. In each case it failed. It will always fail. That system creates insecure, intolerant dictatorships which murder fellow countrymen who disagree with them. And yet, we still hear people talking about the benefits of the redistribution of wealth, which hurts individuals and makes them weak, and causes their nations to become vulnerable to the decay of diminished expectations and laziness.

Case in point was the appearance of MIT Political Science professor, Andrea Louise Campbell, on yesterday’s Washington Journal. She will soon publish an article entitled, The U.S. – The Undertaxed. In it, as in her segment, she states that we need more infrastructure, more public education, transportation. A caller, in support, stated another obvious left-wing talking point. We need more firefighters and police. We’ve heard this all before, and, duh. But Andrea Louise Campbell didn’t examine the question, “Can we afford them?” The government has to be funded somehow – is another simple excuse the left uses to bolster this theory. As I have demonstrated in this blog, if you took all the wealth of all the rich folks away and gave it to the feds, you could not pay down this nation’s nagging debt.

More taxes on the rich. We’ve heard this theory before. Kim Kardashian should pay her fair share. Right. How do we know how she divides her income? As Ms. Campbell calmly described the incomes of the wealthy, she called it ”take home pay.” But the rich don’t take home most of their earnings. They invest most of their bucks - in companies, in stocks, and some in, dare I say, infrastructure (government bonds). For all you know you could be hurting the public sector, too, by sucking the wealthy dry. I don’t claim to know how people like Paris Hilton salt away their funds, but – think about it - they don’t have much take home pay. Ms. Campbell should update her failed socialist theories and look into good old competition. Redistribution of wealth is destructive, not constructive. As Rich DeVos said, “if we don’t challenge them, they’ll take the day.” So stand up and tell people like Ms. Campbell, “It’s not that way!” Our system works, but socialism is still but a dreamer’s theory.

SUGGESTED VIDEOS

The Government Can

Third video down: Rosa Koire explains Agenda 21

Agenda 21 as explained by Karen Schoen

SUGGESTED TV SHOW - for your DVR

Red Eye

SUGGESTED MOVIE

Obama’s America 2016 – Love Him Hate Him – You Don’t Know Him

BLOG ROLL (Political):

Merlin

Gotta B Right

Conservative Blogs Central

Denver Tea Party

Coffee4Conservatives

Libertarian Party Platform

BLOG ROLL (Open Source Hacking):

azcrumpty

BLOG ROLL (Writers):

C.K. Fardoe

BLOG-PING SITES:

FeedPing,

PingMyBlog,

AutoPinger

Keywords: Conservatism, Conservative blog, Mark A. Cohen, From The Left to the Right, Red Eye, MIT, Professor Andrea Louise Campbell, Rich DeVos, socialism, Communism, Capitalism, infrastructure

Keywords: "Conservatism", "Conservative blog", "Mark A. Cohen", "From The Left to the Right", “Red Eye”, “MIT”, “Professor Andrea Louise Campbell”, “Rich DeVos”, “socialism”, “Communism”, “Capitalism”, “infrastructure”

Mark A. Cohen is currently seeking representation for his memoir, From The Left to the Right.

Mark A. Cohen is a member of and helps run the Parker Writers Group

Mark A. Cohen is a member of the Castle Rock Writers

Mark A. Cohen currently sits on the committee which will host the 2012 Castle Rock Writers Conference.

Mark A. Cohen spoke for about 30 minutes at the Douglas County Republicans’ First Friday Breakfast in Parker, CO, held at The War Horse Inn, on Dec. 2, 2011. He will speak this summer, but these speeches are, as yet, unscheduled.

Click on the logo below to get to the main CBC site:

Or, you can find From the Left to the Right on Conservative Blogs Central (it’s now on page 3) by clicking this text.

You might also find From the Left to the Right on the left hand side (after clicking this text) under ‘navigation’ (scroll down a bit) – or, look for/search for/find the text ‘from the’

From the Left to the Right - Follow this link to Facebook

Hyper Smash

THE MORALITY OF CAPITALISM

While penning this ode to capitalism I peered out my window onto my garden. It was in its final days of full flower and the dynamics of its beauty caused my mind to drift into a pensive state. I found myself enthralled by the luminous emerald green grass, the strength and dignity of the mighty oak, the vibrant bursts emanating from the stately maple, and the mosaic-like array of roses, peonies and hydrangea thriving in a garden bed of rich, fertile soil. But while gazing onto this ornate landscape, admiring and grateful for God’s handiwork, I had an epiphany for I was also witnessing first hand the wonders of capitalism.