Washington Establishment Panicking Over Democrat Field

The Washington establishment are now worried and admit that the Democrat presidential field are weak. Even though they have a good representation to attract the common voter, their radical idea to take this country toward socialism is not what America needs.

America has always believe that if something isn’t broke, don’t fit it. This country has thrived for generations because of a balance of conservatism with a hint of social liberal reform. When the balance goes either extreme, problems will occur. This is what we are witnessing.

Today’s Democratic field are radical in their approach how they see America. Their social reforms are not compatible to our Democrats way of life. What may be good for one country doesn’t mean it is good for America. Even Bernie Sanders concedes that climate change reform is too expensive to do. Likewise, every Democrat candidate supports Medicare for all or single payer system. This is Obamacare 2.0 and it will be extremely expensive to fund. If Obamacare didn’t work, the likelihood that the government running the healthcare system would be a total disaster. If the government can’t improve and make the post office, Amtrak, the airports and the DMV run efficiently, I highly doubt they can run healthcare. Keep in mind that anything the government does always ends up as a screw up and we, the America people, will end up fixing the governments mistake.

There is a recent poll suggesting that the Democrat voter wants someone moderate and not too extreme. Thus, we have recently seen Mayor Bloomberg throw his hat into the ring. There are others vying to join, but they are waiting for Joe Biden to falter. Once Biden fails to gain support and lose the donations from the Liberal elites, you will see their donation flow to a Democrat candidate with more credible electability. That would be Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, or Oprah.

Honestly, there is no one in the field with the pedigree to be a true leader in the Democratic Party. If only a Kennedy, with the values of a true moderate Democrat like JFK, came into the picture, it would bring a level of concern to the Republican Party. However, that’s not going to happen any time soon. In my own opinion, I expect another term for Trump.

Hillary Clinton, Establishment Democrats Signal Deepening Panic over Democrat Field

Elections Have Consequences

Elections Have Consequences

Ah, Democrats—and the mainstream media. Is that being redundant? They want members of the Electoral College to ignore their responsibility to cast ballots according to the provisions of their respective states and instead vote for Hillary Clinton for President. Unprecedented. Quasi-illegal.

They would have you up in arms because the Russians interfered in our American presidential election. How did they do that? You see, none of the voting machines in any state are connected to the internet (as far as I know—if they are, I would suggest the Democrats would be more likely to sabotage our elections than the Russians). No, you see, what the Russians did (and we have it on very good authority—Obama’s CIA) was hack the Democrat National Committee’s email account and—what else? Hillary’s private server?—to release emails, none of which, at this writing, have been denied as to their authenticity.

All this could have been prevented by the performance of one simple expediency: Had Hillary released all those emails in a timely fashion, when they were requested by Congress and by the FBI, the attendant consequences would have been faced and possibly overcome by the time of the election. She had a choice, and she chose to ignore subpoenas requesting ALL emails her office had sent and received during her tenure as Secretary of State. In essence, until Wikileaks started releasing emails pilfered from the Democrat National Committee’s “secure” server, all previous emails concerning Hillary’s conduct of affairs as Secretary of State should have already been in the public domain—released, publicized and vetted—according to the law.  Ah, but there’s the rub. You see, what we deplorables have not come to understand is that the law was never meant to be applied to the Clintons. Tell me who else—besides perhaps Barack Obama—would have the audacity to establish his own private server, rather than utilizing supposedly secure government equipment, in defiance of the law and presidential orders?

Who else would have so little regard for security as to relay classified information through her cleaning lady, who I think it is safe to say does not have a Top Secret security clearance? Who else might tell the Supreme Court, “I know what your subpoena says, but these are all the emails you are going to get from me.”?

Let’s go back to a point made earlier in this piece; the fact that this is Barack Obama’s CIA that has ostensibly obtained sufficient evidence to conclude that it was the Russians who hacked into Hillary’s private server and that of the DNC. An unintended consequence of using the IRS, ICE, FBI, CIA and any other government agency as water-carriers for the administration—to silence objections and deny equal access—is that it tends to make Americans doubtful of anything—ANYTHING—the government might say through any of its agencies. There are times, I am sure, when President Obama desperately NEEDS the American people to believe him. Some information coming from his office might be true; might even be critical for the American people to know. However, like the little boy in the fairy tale who cried wolf one too many times, he has sacrificed all believability. In fact, if you still believe what the President puts out, I have a friend who would like to talk to you about some oceanfront property he has for sale in Oklahoma.

Although he appears to have forgotten it, Obama famously told the Republicans in 2008 or 2012; maybe both: “There are consequences to losing elections”. Those consequences exist for both parties, Mr. President.

Benghazi Murders – the Obama Way

They are experts at covering up, hiding and withholding information.  It’s a way of life for the Obama Administration. Obama directs every scandal that comes our way from a distance – he is the director behind the director unscathed and free as a bird. 

His peons scramble to get the props in place before the sh--  hits the fan. Each one knows their part and sets the stage for his devious scandals. The Benghazi terrorist attack took four beautiful American Patriots from us and yet almost 11 months later, we’re just treading water playing the cat and mouse game just like we did with the Fast and Furious gunrunner project.

Panetta and Biden slinked away into the night hiding out in their assigned dog houses waiting, just waiting until the smoke clears.  Clinton scored a home run on the witness stand slipping, sliding and hitting one home run after the other. She knows the art of interrogation and pretty much shut her interrogators down as she finalized her testimony by thrashing about, raising her hand, grimacing and yelling, “What difference does it really make?”

Rice slipped thru the cracks for a while until Obama was ready to assign her a new position and her excuse for lying on National TV was this; she said she was just a patsy, I guess that’s a round about way of apologizing expressing that her lies on 5 National talk shows wasn’t her fault. Guess she’s not prepared to point her finger at anyone, but we all know someone in the White House wrote the script about video being responsible for the Benghazi massacre.  

Jay Carney came to the table doing his soft shoe dance pulling one rabbit after the other out of his hat for the news media spinning his falsehoods. Problem is Jay doesn’t have his hat anymore and has run out of rabbit food. The press is starting to prey on Jay and he’d best get his running shoes on, because the media no longer buys his lies.

And then there’s (Obama) - to hear him talk he no longer gets morning briefings and must depend on the news media to get him up to snuff. Obama will say, “I personally am not involved in these scandals, they are” – just who the heck is “They” Obama? 

The Benghazi murders remain a mystery, each player has lied and played the blame game.  There are many conspiracy theories about the Benghazi murders and so far the Obama Administration has managed to hide out above the law covering up their paper trail as they go... 

We do know starting in early 2012 Ambassador Stevens requested more protection and his requests were denied. We know Lamb watched the Benghazi terrorist attack on our Ambassador and other Americans in real time via the drones. We know that Obama, Hillary and Panetta were advised while still in the White House about the attack on our Consulate and Ambassador Stevens.  

We know that Obama split and ran that night to prepare for a political campaign in Las Vegas never to be heard from again.  Hillary did whatever Hillary does, maybe more wine tasting or possibly she flagged down a plane and went to her favorite Cuban bar (Cafe Havana) for a little bit of dancing and relaxation. Anyway out of sight, out of mind – Hillary wasn’t the least bit concerned about the Benghazi attack.

We know that our Military was given direct orders to step down leaving our Ambassador and three other American men at the mercy of the terrorists.

A quick snapshot of the Benghazi events seems self evident that the Benghazi scandal was pre-planned months before Sept 11, 2012. It’s doubtful that Obama, Hillary and Panetta wanted our Ambassador and three other Americans murdered by terrorists just before the Election.

The fact that Obama, Clinton and Panetta were apparently unconcerned, totally disengaged and uninterested when they were informed of the attack on our Consulate and Ambassador Stevens leads one to believe that the three didn’t think our Ambassador would be murdered. The orders to step down would suggest that they believed Chris Stevens would be kidnapped on the night of September 11, 2012, not murdered.

Their original Benghazi plan didn’t go off like clockwork; our four Americans were murdered by terrorists. Being between a rock and a hard place, Obama’s team realized that he would probably lose the Presidential Election if Americans caught wind of his negligence as Commander in Chief. 

So the Obama Administration switched gears blaming the YouTube video for the next 5 plus weeks. To solidify their scheme they had the creator of the video arrested in the middle of the night and placed behind bars. Obama and Hillary created a video for their Muslim friends apologizing for the video. 

Jay Carney, Susan Rice and the Liberal News Media were the appointed messengers to spread the word about the video.  Obama and Clinton followed suit putting on their sad faces, pretending outrage and beating the YouTube video to death, but it worked look who’s in the White House for a second term.   

May God Bless America

As Always,

Little Tboca

Connect the Dots: Operation Penetrate – Part Two

Before we go further, I think it would be prudent to provide a brief explanation as to just who some of these terrorist organizations and terrorist sympathizers are.

AL QAEDA: Al Qaeda is a global militant Islamic terrorist organization founded by Osama bin Laden in 1988/1989. Al Qaeda calls for a global Islamic jihad and is best known for its attacks on America on September 11, 2001. It has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union and NATO as well as various other countries. (Source)

Al SHABAAB: Also known as Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen (HSM), Al Shabaab is a militant Islamic organization that has been attempting to overthrow the government of Somalia. In November 2009, Al Shabaab established an Al Quds Brigade, a paramilitary unit created specifically for attacking Israel and Jewish interests in Africa. In 2010, Al Shabaab announced that it maintained strong ties with Al Qaeda. They are probably best known for their attack on Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard due to his satirical cartoons featuring Mohammed. Al Shabaab has been designated a terrorist organization by Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. (Source)

HAMAS: Hamas was founded in 1987 as an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. According to it’s charter, Hamas exists to establish an Islamic state in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Hamas is known to use violence against U.S. interests in the Middle East and on American soil. Hamas has received support from Iran and collaborates with the terrorist group Hezbollah. Hamas was designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department in 1993. (Source)

HEZBOLLAH: Also known as the “Party of god”, Hezbollah receives training, weapons and financial support from Iran and Syria. Several countries have classified Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, and it was designated as such by the United States in 1999. (Source)

THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD: Founded in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood claims to be a non-religious political party. It’s stated goals include the instillation of the Koran and the Sunnah as the “sole reference point for ordering the life of the Muslim family, individual, community and state.” This includes the enforcement of Shariah law, the re-establishment of the Caliphate, and imposing the jizya tax on all non-Muslims in exchange for protection from the state. Its slogan is “Islam is the solution.” All of the 9/11 hijackers were associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, and the current leader of Al Qaeda was arrested in the 1980’s due to his involvement with Muslim Brotherhood terrorist activities. The Muslim Brotherhood maintains a presence in Bahrain, Syria, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yeman, Algeria, Sudan, Somalia, Tunisia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In spite of its documented terrorist activities and close ties with known terrorist organizations, the Muslim Brotherhood has not been designated a terrorist organization. (Source) (Source) (Source)

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR): CAIR is a pro-Islamic advocacy group founded in 1994 by Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad, and Rafeeq Jaber, three officials of the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP), an organization described as having intimate ties with the terror group Hamas. CAIR is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has regional offices nationwide. In 2007 CAIR was named by federal prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorist funding investigation. In 2008, FBI Special Agent Lara Burns stated that CAIR was “a front group for Hamas, and in 2009  FBI headquarters issued a mandate to all FBI field offices to sever all ties with CAIR as a result of CAIR’s ties with Hamas.

Continue Reading Here

Connect the Dots: Operation Penetrate – Part One

I really enjoyed the Mel Gibson film Conspiracy Theory. In fact, I love conspiracies altogether. Not that I believe them, but they are fun. One of the things that I find fascinating about them is that in any good conspiracy, there is at least a grain of truth. I would even go so far to say that in any good conspiracy, the facts are almost always true or at least a good percentage of them. The problem does not lie in the facts surrounding the conspiracy, but in the conclusion, the interpretation of those facts.

Of course, the facts must be pertinent to the conspiracy; otherwise the conclusion / conspiracy will sound completely ridiculous regardless of the truth of the facts surrounding it. One can say that the former logo used by Procter & Gamble featured what appeared to be rams horns, and that the logo also featured a male face that was attached to the rams horns, and the numbers 666 appear throughout the logo and that the logo also featured 13 stars. All of this is true – at least to some extent. The conclusion based on these facts, however, was that since the number 666 is the number of Satan, and that the devil has rams horns and that the number 13 is also a satanic number – then obviously Procter & Gamble is a satanic organization. The problem with this is that it is all hogwash. The so-called ram’s horns are actually the moon, and the face is that of the man in the moon, and the 666 that is seen is merely curls in the hair and beard of the man in the moon. But you can see where conspiracies must have actual documented facts that are pertinent to the conclusion in order to be even remotely believable. One must be able to connect the dots so to speak, and the dots must follow a logical progression in order to arrive at a reasonable conclusion. Whether or not that conclusion is true is another matter.

Now that’s one heck of a prologue isn’t it! So, with that all being said, I will now present a group of facts that I have noticed over the past several months while surfing the web. I will not present a final conclusion based on this group of facts, however. I will leave that up to the reader (and no, the images appearing in this article are not a conclusion, they are merely satirical in nature, so don’t draw any conclusions based on them. Draw your conclusions only on the facts presented). But I would be interested to see if these are all just random facts that do not lead to any conclusion, or if there is something really here. If the following facts really were part of a conspiracy (as opposed to nothing more than completely random unconnected facts and incidents) then I would call this (non) conspiracy:

“After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, we learned that our immigration system had been used by foreign terrorists to gain a safe haven in the United States. All of the 9/11 hijackers received visas to come to the U.S. And once they were here, all but one of the 9/11 hijackers acquired some form of a U.S. identification document. These forms of ID helped them board commercial flights on 9/11.” – Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) (Source)

“The southern border is porous, and we need to shut it down if we hope to get ahead of the problems that illegal immigration brings, …Less than 5 percent of the 125,000 containers coming into this country each day are ever inspected.” – Joe M. Allbaugh, former FEMA Director  (Source)

In February 2011, the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report which states that of the 1,969 mile border with Mexico, only 873 have been deemed secure according to the standards of the Department of Homeland Security. (Source)

There is little doubt that the federal government has either created a porous border (overtly or covertly), or has been ineffectual in creating a secure border (either overtly or covertly). Even the director of the FBI, Robert Mueller has stated that we “live in a world where borders and boundaries are increasingly irrelevant.” (Source)

That the federal government has allowed such a porous border, and that FBI Director Mueller considers borders irrelevant is cause for concern, especially in light of known anti-America terrorist groups operating in Canada and Mexico. It has been speculated that there are more international terrorist organizations active in Canada than anywhere else in the world. Groups such as Al Qaeda, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Armed Islamic Group (GIA) and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad group are all suspected of operating in Canada. (Source). Rep. John Culbertson of Texas has stated that Mexico is home to Al Qaeda training camps (Source), and there is evidence that both Hezbollah and Iran have a strong presence in Mexico as well. (Source). Hezbollah has even gone so far as to brag about waging war on the United States, yet for some reason, the American government seems to be ignoring this. (Source)

Continue Reading Here