A Strategic Shockwave: The Venezuelan Operation and Its Global Reverberations

A Strategic Shockwave: The Venezuelan Operation and Its Global Reverberations

In the early hours of the Venezuelan operation, the world witnessed a military action so precise, so rapid, and so unexpectedly clean that analysts immediately compared it to the most successful covert strikes of the modern era. Commentators noted that the mission unfolded with the same surgical efficiency attributed to past high‑stakes operations, including the strikes on Iranian nuclear assets — actions often cited for their precision and lack of casualties.

What set this event apart was not only its execution but its implications. For the first time in decades, a sitting foreign head of state — Nicolás Maduro — was captured alive in a lightning‑fast U.S. operation. And unlike past crises that spiraled into chaos, this mission reported no American deaths, no civilian casualties, and no prolonged firefight.

Long before the first helicopter lifted off, Maduro was already under a U.S. federal indictment. Prosecutors had charged him with narco‑terrorism, cocaine trafficking, and weapons‑related conspiracies, alleging that he helped funnel tons of cocaine into the United States while partnering with armed groups. Supporters of the operation argue that this indictment provided the legal foundation for the mission, framing it not as a declaration of war but as the apprehension of an indicted criminal who happened to occupy a presidential palace.

Historical Contrast: A Tale of Three Presidencies

Observers quickly drew comparisons to earlier moments in American history when military or rescue operations went tragically wrong. Commentators referenced the failed attempt to rescue American hostages in Iran during the Carter administration, where mechanical failures and a deadly crash ended the mission before it began. Others pointed to the attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi during the Obama administration, where a rapid rescue never materialized and American personnel were left exposed. More recently, critics highlighted the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan under President Biden, where the collapse of Kabul and the loss of American service members became defining images.

Against this backdrop, supporters of the Venezuelan operation argue that the contrast is stark: a mission planned quietly, executed swiftly, and completed without loss of life. They claim it demonstrates a philosophy often attributed to Trump by his allies — that when he states an intention, he follows through with decisive action.

The Narratives Begin to Form

Even before the dust settled, political narratives began to crystallize.

Critics’ Narrative

Some members of Congress questioned whether the operation constituted an unauthorized act of war. Others suggested it amounted to regime change, arguing that removing a foreign leader by force — even one under indictment — carries geopolitical risks. These critics framed the mission as bypassing congressional authority and potentially destabilizing international norms.

Supporters’ Narrative

Supporters countered that the mission was a lawful apprehension of an indicted narco‑terrorist, not a war. They emphasized the absence of casualties, the precision of the strike, and the broader strategic message it sent to hostile actors. They argued that the operation restored deterrence and demonstrated that American warnings carry weight.

A Global Chessboard Reconfigured

Beyond domestic politics, the operation sent shockwaves through the geopolitical landscape. Venezuela had long served as a strategic foothold for China, Russia, Iran, and Mexican cartel networks. Each had invested heavily in the Maduro regime:

• Russia provided military advisors, loans, and energy partnerships.

• China built infrastructure, telecom systems, and long‑term oil agreements.

• Iran used Venezuela as a hub for sanctions‑evasion, gold transfers, and fuel swaps.

• Cartels relied on Venezuelan territory as a corridor for cocaine shipments.

With Maduro removed and the U.S. overseeing a transitional process, analysts argue that these networks face sudden disruption. Supply chains, influence channels, and covert financial routes are now uncertain. Commentators suggest that the operation serves as a strategic signal to adversarial governments: that the United States is willing to act decisively when its interests or security are threatened.

Some foreign‑policy experts interpret the mission as a warning to Iran, particularly amid concerns about protest crackdowns. Others see it as a blow to Russia, whose influence in the Western Hemisphere depended heavily on Maduro’s survival. For China, the loss of a key partner in the southern hemisphere complicates long‑term strategic planning. And for Mexican cartels, the message is unmistakable: high‑value targets are no longer insulated by geography or political alliances.

A Turning Point With Global Implications

Whether viewed through the lens of law enforcement, military strategy, or geopolitical signaling, the Venezuelan operation marks a turning point. It disrupted entrenched foreign influence, reshaped regional power dynamics, and demonstrated the impact of rapid, decisive action.

Supporters argue that the mission reflects a broader pattern: when Trump states an intention — whether about borders, adversaries, or foreign threats — he acts on it. Critics will continue to debate the legality and long‑term consequences, but even they acknowledge the operation’s unprecedented precision.

In a world accustomed to prolonged conflicts, messy withdrawals, and missions that falter under pressure, this strike stands out as a rare example of a high‑risk operation executed without loss of life. Its implications will unfold for years, but its immediate effect is clear: the global chessboard has shifted, and the players who once relied on Venezuela as a strategic anchor must now rethink their next move.

The Iranian Awakening: Why the World Should Pay Attention to the Most Important Uprising of Our Time

 THE IRANIAN AWAKENING: Why the World Should Pay Attention to the Most Important Uprising of Our Time

For decades, Iran has been one of the most influential — and destabilizing — forces in the Middle East. Its government has funded militant groups, projected power through proxy wars, and aligned itself with global rivals of the United States. But beneath the surface, something extraordinary has been happening: a slow, painful buildup of frustration that finally erupted after the death of Mahsa Amini in 2022.

This moment is not small.

This is not a “nothing burger.”

This is a geopolitical turning point with consequences far beyond Iran’s borders.

---

🔥 1. The Spark: The Death That Shook a Nation

Mahsa Amini, a 22‑year‑old woman, died after being detained by Iran’s morality police for allegedly wearing her hijab incorrectly. Her death ignited a nationwide movement led by women, students, and young people who had lived their entire lives under the Islamic Republic.

This wasn’t a protest.

It was a national awakening.

---

🕰️ 2. Before 1979: Iran Was Not Always Like This

To understand the magnitude of today’s uprising, you have to remember what Iran once was.

Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution:

• Iran was open, modern, and culturally vibrant

• Western fashion, music, and cinema were part of everyday life

• Women wore what they wanted — miniskirts, jeans, dresses, or hijabs by choice

• Universities were co‑ed and thriving

• Nightlife, art, and tourism flourished

• Alcohol, cosmetics, and Western brands were common

• Tehran was considered one of the most progressive cities in the Middle East

• Foreigners traveled freely, and many lived and worked there

• The economy was growing, and infrastructure was expanding

• Iran was aligned with the West and seen as a rising regional power

Ask any Iranian who lived through that era, and they’ll tell you:

Iran was free, open, and full of possibility.

The revolution didn’t just change the government.

It reversed the entire cultural direction of the country.

---

⚔️ 3. After 1979: A Theocracy Built on Control

The Islamic Revolution replaced a modernizing monarchy with a strict theocratic regime. Overnight, Iran became:

• a state with mandatory hijab laws

• a society policed by religious enforcers

• a country where dissent was crushed

• a place where minorities faced new restrictions

• a nation where political opposition disappeared

• an economy increasingly isolated and mismanaged

The morality police became a symbol of the regime’s grip on daily life.

And over the decades, the pressure only grew.

---

🌋 4. The Protests Are Not Foreign‑Made — They Are Decades of Pain Exploding at Once

Foreign interference is a real part of Iran’s history.

But this moment is different.

This uprising wasn’t engineered from outside.

It was born from:

• economic collapse

• inflation and a failing currency

• corruption

• religious overreach

• generational exhaustion

• the death of a young woman who became a symbol of national humiliation

The Iranian people didn’t need a foreign push.

They reached clarity on their own.

---

✝️ 5. A Quiet Spiritual Shift: Christianity Rising Underground

While rarely discussed openly, many Iranians have grown disillusioned with the regime’s religious ideology. Underground Christian communities have quietly expanded, especially among younger generations searching for meaning, hope, and freedom.

This spiritual shift is part of the broader cultural transformation happening inside Iran.

---

🌍 6. Why This Matters for Global Stability

Iran has long been a major funder of militant groups, including Hamas. A shift in Iran’s internal ideology — away from theocratic authoritarianism and toward freedom‑seeking civil society — would have enormous implications for the region.

A freer Iran would mean:

• less funding for militant groups

• reduced regional destabilization

• more room for diplomacy

• fewer proxy conflicts

• a potential easing of tensions with the United States

Iran’s alliances with China and Russia have also shaped global power dynamics. A change in Iran’s direction could reduce friction between these major powers and the West.

This is not a small story.

This is a global recalibration in the making.

---

🕊️ 7. A Tiananmen‑Like Moment — In Spirit, Not in Politics

The comparison isn’t about predicting outcomes.

It’s about recognizing a moment when a nation’s soul refuses to stay silent.

Just as Tiananmen Square symbolized a generation demanding dignity, the Mahsa Amini movement symbolizes an Iranian generation saying:

“Enough.”

---

🌅 8. The World Should Not Look Away

Despite the courage of the protesters and the brutality of the regime’s response, global media coverage has often been muted. But the truth remains:

• This is the largest challenge to the Islamic Republic in decades

• It is driven by the people, not foreign governments

• It has the potential to reshape the Middle East

• It could alter global alliances

• It could reduce conflict and increase stability

This is not a footnote.

This is history unfolding in real time.

---

✨ Conclusion: Iran’s Awakening Is a Turning Point for the World

If Iran changes, the region changes.

If the region changes, the world changes.

The Iranian people are not asking for interference.

They are asking for dignity, freedom, and a future.

And the world should be paying attention.

Iran Closes 50,000 out of 75,000 Mosque. Many are Finding Christ Instead

🌍 From Freedom to Chains, From Chains to Christ: Iran’s Journey Through God’s Mysterious Ways

✨ The Iran of the 1970s: A Different World

In the 1970s, Iran was a nation where women walked freely without compulsory veils, where universities thrived with diverse voices, and where religious freedom was not a slogan but a lived reality. Islam was a faith, not a political party. The streets of Tehran echoed with music, art, and debate. The nation was imperfect, but it was not bound by the iron grip of radical ideology.

⚔️ The Rise of Political Islam

That changed in 1979, when Ayatollah Khomeini and his radical Islamist movement seized power. What began as a revolution quickly hardened into a theocracy. Islam was weaponized into a political party, and the government became a machine of control. Women were forced under the veil, dissent was crushed, and religious minorities were silenced. The Iran of freedom became the Iran of fear.

📉 The Decline of the Regime

Decades later, the cracks are undeniable. Reports reveal that two-thirds of Iran’s mosques—around 50,000 out of 75,000—stand closed due to low attendance. The younger generation is turning away from the regime’s imposed religiosity. The government’s grip is dissolving, not because of sanctions, NATO pressure, or isolation, but because hearts are changing.

✝️ The Quiet Rise of Christianity

In the shadows of repression, a new light is shining. Christianity is quietly, steadily growing in Iran. Underground churches multiply, testimonies spread, and Iranians weary of corruption and oppression are finding hope in Christ. This is not a political maneuver—it is a spiritual awakening. The Gospel is reaching hearts where politics cannot.

🙌 God’s Mysterious Work

The dissolution of Iran’s religious-political machinery is not the work of Trump, NATO, or sanctions. It is the work of God, who moves in mysterious ways. When Christ is accepted, the heart changes. Clarity replaces confusion. Freedom replaces fear. The true revolution is not in the streets—it is in the soul.

🔑 The Lesson for Us

Iran’s story is a reminder that no government, no ideology, no regime can stand forever against the power of God’s truth. Nations rise and fall, but the Kingdom of God endures. What we see in Iran today is not merely political decay—it is divine renewal.

America Neutered Iran. Keep America Great

Please don’t be alarm. The MSM are on the side of Iran and against Trump. If you pay attention to what you watch on tv and listen to the radio, you will get the full understanding what the media are saying minus the toxic rhetoric.

This is what you need to understand.

Iran broadcast that they will launch several missiles to US bases in Iraq. The missiles miss its mark. Don’t be fooled by the media as they loop a clip to repeat itself showing a barrage of missiles being fired at US bases. It is fake new. Iran had to do something to save face without committing a full scale war against USA. No one killed or injured. Property was damage, but nothing to do to cause a retaliation. It was a childish move a spoiled brat would do wanting more attention.

Trump speech to the nation gave a glimpse to the world that the USA is the superpower that doesn’t need the world, but the world needs the USA. Trump reminded that global recession hasn’t affected USA because the US economy remains strong, unemployment low, and USA is energy independent. Trump reminded the world that USA don’t need other countries oil. America is able to produce oil and gas at anytime. Trump suggested that America won’t be highjack by OPEC or any country wanting to manipulate the price of oil. The speech to the nation and the world proclaimed that peace through strength will be the new motto for America. Trump bragged that the he spent $2.5 trillion to improve the military with newer technology and an increase of military force.  This is the same belief that Ronald Reagan used when he was president.

Because Iran knows the capability of the USA, America was able to neuter Iran.

America Neutered Iran via Peace Through Strength

Two Huge Terrorist Leaders Dead and Economy Remains Okay

Back during the 1st term of Obama in the Oval Office, he needed to show some sort leadership to secure a second term in office. That opportunity occurred in May 2011. Obama gave the go signal to take out Osama Bin Laden. Even though rumors suggest that Bin Laden died under George W. Bush’s watch, the Obama Administration reported they took out the terrorist leader responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Actually, Osama bin Laden was more of a figure head and didn’t have a real hand in the orchestrating that diabolical crime. It was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was the mastermind of the attack, and Mohammed Atef, who carried out the plan. Khalid was captured and Atef was killed by a bomb attack. Both are credited under Bush.

Whatever the narrative, the media boasted and lifted Obama as the one who put closure to 9/11. With the stock market moving higher due to low interest rates, but wages moving at a dismal rate, that was enough to catapult Obama to another term in office.

Fast forward to 2020. Under Trump, he was credited to end the terror of ISIS leader al-Baghadadi  and Iranian General Soleimani, who was responsible of many American deaths. Killing both individuals are more significant than taking out an anemic Osama bin Laden. Add to that, Americans are experiencing a real fantastic economy, which can be measure by consumer confidence and how much money American are keeping.  That to itself is scaring the Democrats in Washington.  Trump is following a model that other presidents had done to get re-electioned. Reagan did it. Same can be said for George W. Bush. There has to be a balance between getting it done domestically and internationally. That means keeping the economic machine running and upholding the law; while making sure foreign policy is keeping America safe.

Instead of coddling with the enemy like Obama had done, Trump is showing off the USA military might. Instead of picking up the phone and tell them to stop it like Obama had done, Trump went on the offensive and did something about it. Instead of paying off the enemy like Obama had done, Trump wouldn’t turn a blind eye. Trump exemplify what a true leader should do.

Killing the Iranian terrorist General was significant. Typically, the DOW Jones is sensitive to issues related to international affairs. With Iran, the price of foreign oil has an impact to the DOW Jones, but not in this case. Since Soleimani death, the stock market went up. The reason why is that the markets saw Soleimani as a bad guy and the USA is considered an oil powerhouse.  No more are we being dictated by OPEC and other foreign countries that produces oil. USA don’t need them. We are self reliant. Putting USA into the oil market, there is balance. There isn’t anymore corruption or manipulation to the price of oil and the price of gas.

Bring It On Iran! USA Will Destroy You

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. The first week of the year brings a lot of stories from the media. It was nice to relax and not look what’s happening in the world. The season of Christmas for me was to go to church to celebrate the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ and the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God. That was very important to me and not to be a sucker on the foolishness of men.

However, it didn’t stop me from listening to talk radio to catch up with the current events.

So far, Pelosi is justifying why she isn’t presenting the articles of impeachment to the Senate. It’s pretty weak. The MSM are pontificating rubbish on the television and radio. They are all in unison stating that Pelosi wants to make sure that the Senate can turn an impeachment into a conviction.  Of course, the Democrat Senate has no possible way to make that happen. They don’t have the votes. Technically, Pelosi is a damn hypocrite. The idea of a quid pro quo that the Democrats are blaming on the president is exactly what Pelosi is doing. Pelosi won’t give the articles of impeachment unless she gets something in return; a conviction.  That, my friend, is a quid pro quo, or in layman’s term, a bribery.

Through various media outlets, I can surmise that Pelosi screwed herself to a corner. She delayed presenting the articles of impeachment because there is no case. She won’t accept the terms of the Senate regarding how they will proceed with the trail. The Senate Republican Majority leader stated that the trial will follow the same rules under the Clinton impeachment trail. Back then, Schumer, Biden, Pelosi, and all the Democrats supported it. Now, they turned a blind eye and want more witnesses to be subpoena. This has turned into the circus.

The House is responsible to investigate and impeach. The House sends managers to represent the House during the Senate trial and defend the articles of impeachment. The Senate listens to the case, writes questions for the Supreme Court Justice Roberts, who will be presiding over the impeachment, to be asked, and then vote. The Democrats wants to change the whole procedure because the Democrats and the establishment hates the president. In my opinion, Pelosi is acting like an idiot. The Senate don’t care if Pelosi sends the articles of impeachment. She is screwing herself. I have read various articles and listened to talk radio that Pelosi strategy is not to impede the Iowa Caucuses and Super Tuesday. I won’t be surprised that the articles of impeachment would be release after a clear presidential Democrat front runner can be secured. Currently, after 6 debates, there is no one that stands out to take on Trump in the 2020 elections.

But enough of that. The new year brings another narrative. Trump gave the orders to kill an Iran military leader, Qasam Soleimani, who had been responsible for many American deaths, and various other high profiled leaders, who were enemies of the USA. While the media and the liberal Democrats are screaming we are entering a war with Iran, I want to say, “don’t get your panties in an uproar.” There won’t be a physical war. There are mentions of more Iranian drone attacks like the one with the Saudi oil fields, and a possible cyberattack. These are less concerning than going an all out war on Iran. First, Iran is in no position to fuck with the USA. Unlike the premise that war increases the economy and productivity, Iran is under strict sanctions from the world that it would be impossible to restart an economy. Because of strict sanctions, their trade has been hampered, double digit unemployment, sky rocketing inflation, and their people are revolting. 

Because the USA stated that if they fuck with us and retaliate, the USA will strike very harshly. In return, Iran said they will restart their nuclear enrichment program. That is nothing new. Iran has been enriching uranium since the Obama Administration lifted sanctions. It just gives Iran and excuse to do what they have doing for years. 

I place blame on Obama and his weak foreign policy. Allowing Russian to invade another country, lifting sanctions with Iran, letting China proliferate as a super power, and coddled North Korea, it will take Trumps economy and military strength to fix the stupidity of the former man-child president.


Meadows: Iranians ‘Should Be Worried’ — Not About Regime Change, Their Economy Is Imploding

Perhaps Patton Was Right?

Perhaps Patton was right in 1945?

"If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on, we will get weaker and they will get stronger."

"I believe that Germany should not be destroyed, but rather should be rebuilt as a buffer to the real danger, which is Russia and its Bolshevism."

"Russia knows what she wants, World Domination...If we have to fight them, now is the time...."

"...the Third Army alone...could lick what is left of the Russians in six weeks."

But, as they say, “hindsight is 20-20!”

And, this time we have no Reagan to combat the ambitions of Putin who seeks to restore Russia (Soviet Union?) to prominence again.

Let’s be clear…Syria is a “loss leader” much like an item sold below cost to attract customers to a store.

Neither Russia nor their partner Iran could care less what happens in Syria. If Assad falls, they’ll deal with the rebels. If not, it’s business as usual.

Syria will remain a proxy of Iran (just like Iraq) and Russia will continue to provide technology to our enemy…though, they’ll be sure to maintain a technological edge because they too distrust Iran!

China distrusts them both, but will wait for the story to play out. They need the oil, and could care less who they deal with.

A pretty pickle Obama’s got himself into. A situation, I might add, that was predicted some time ago by this author and the gang at Sack Heads Radio.

I can only hope President Obama is feigning ignorance and realizes he’s being baited into attacking Syria or not attacking Syria…both “no-win” decisions.

Read More At Conservative Outcry

Tilting At Windmills

Since last Saturday when The Insufferable Airhorn spoke in the Rose Garden about the “crisis” in Syria, we have seen the political role reversals of hawks and doves.

Bill Kristol, whom I abandoned some time ago, suggested in his op-ed at The Weekly Standard that “using this resolution to cast a vote of no confidence against Obama would empower those abroad making the case against placing confidence in the United States. That would be damaging. And in the real world, a vote against Obama will be seen as a vote for Bashar al-Assad, and for Vladimir Putin, and for the regime in Iran.”

Kristol insists “the right vote” by Republicans, a party that for at least two generations has held the banner of American leadership and strength, should not cast a vote that obviously risks a damaging erosion of this country’s stature and credibility abroad.”

Kristol continues, “A Yes vote is in fact the easy vote. It’s actually close to risk-free. After all, it’s President Obama who is seeking the authorization to use force and who will order and preside over the use of force. It’s fundamentally his policy. Lots of Democrats voted in 2002 to authorize the Iraq war. When that war ran into trouble, it was President Bush and Republicans who paid the price. If the Syria effort goes badly, the public will blame President Obama, who dithered for two years, and who seems inclined to a halfhearted execution of any military campaign. If it goes well, Republicans can take credit for pushing him to act decisively, and for casting a tough vote supporting him when he asked for authorization to act.”

Kristol, to my way of thinking, is correct on one point:  President Bush and the Republicans did pay the price when the Iraq war effort went badly and if Syria goes badly the current Oval Office occupant will be evisorated.  Kristol’s only concern is about Republican senators and congressmen re-establishing their “anti-Obama credentials.”  Good grief, man.  Sending our men and women to another pesthole is all kinds of wrong.

Caught between Iraq and a hard place are two of our betters—Hollywood actors Ed Asner and Mike Farrell.  In a stunning revelation about the silence of Tinseltown and their disappointment in their idol’s penchant for military action Farrell said, "I'm frankly deeply disappointed in the president's foreign policy, war-making, his reliance on military rather than diplomatic responses, his use of drones, continued allowance of the Guantanamo prison. He's a disappointment to me and other people I know."

"I voted for him, but I'm not proud. He hasn't thrown himself on the funeral pyre. I wanted him to sacrifice himself. Instead, he has proved himself to be a corporatist, and as long as he's a corporatist, he's not my president," Asner said. "A lot of people have lost hope—with the betrayals, the NSA spying…People aren't getting active because 'Who gives a shit?' is essentially the bottom line."

Another reason some Hollywood progressives have been reticent to speak out against war in Syria, according to Asner, is fear of being called racist.  "A lot of people don't want to feel anti-black by being opposed to Obama," he said.

What a magnificent example of cowardice.

Then there’s this.  District of Columbia delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) who has been a member of Congress since January 1991 confessed recently that if President McBombypants actually gets the votes he needs for the resolution “it’ll be because of loyalty of Democrats. They just don’t want to see him shamed and humiliated on the national stage."

On Thursday, September 5th, Chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus issued what is, in effect, a gag order asking members to “limit public comment”.  The request was designed to quiet dissent while “shoring up support for President Obama’s Syria strategy.”

That “red line” The Insufferable Airhorn has now disowned has gotten all over him, Hollywood and progressive activists.  It’s one big clusterfuck..

It reminds me of Don Quixote de la Mancha.  Quixote, as we all remember from our high school or college lit classes, was a victim of his delusions.  In Miguel de Cervantes’ novel, knight-errant Quixote tilts at windmills that he imagines to be giants:

“Just then they came in sight of thirty or forty windmills that rise from that plain. And no sooner did Don Quixote see them that he said to his squire, ‘Fortune is guiding our affairs better than we ourselves could have wished. Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them. With their spoils we shall begin to be rich for this is a righteous war and the removal of so foul a brood from off the face of the earth is a service God will bless.’"  

"What giants?" asked Sancho Panza.  

"Those you see over there," replied his master, "with their long arms. Some of them have arms well nigh two leagues in length."  

"Take care, sir," cried Sancho. "Those over there are not giants but windmills. Those things that seem to be their arms are sails which, when they are whirled around by the wind, turn the millstone."

It is obvious to this observer that we have Don Quixote in the White House begging for lawmakers to unleash the dogs of war in a vicious snake pit of cannibalistic rebels and savage Islamic extremists.

I believe that America should stay out of Syria.  Let neighboring nations deal with the barbarians at their gate.  I am quite certain that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has the spine of steel needed to protect his people.

"Once we take action, we should be prepared for what comes next," wrote General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, only one month ago. "Deeper involvement is hard to avoid."

We have learned in this decade via the Iranian Green Revolution in 2009 that barbarian elements in social revolutions cannot be harnessed.  Neda Agha-Soltan died of a single gunshot wound to the chest. Her last moments—captured on a cell phone camera and shown around the world—catapulted her into the symbol of the postelection reform movement in Iran.

No one will say how many have died in Egypt’s coup against the Muslim Brotherhood.

Two years after the Arab Spring revolution that toppled longtime dictator Moammar Gaddafi, and one year after the assault on the U.S. compound in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others, Libya’s fragile government has little control over the nation’s security.

The whole of the Middle East is a powder keg and the blast wave that we invite by interfering in Syria may well involve America in a conflagration of tectonic proportions.

One final thought, the errand boy sent by grocery clerks is slated to speak to the nation this Tuesday on taking military action against Syria’s Bashar al-Assad.  For the whole of his second term, this president and his apparatchiks have deflected and distracted through sleight-of-hand and carefully coordinated propaganda, not the least of which has been on the issue of Benghazi.  The lies are damnable. 

I think it’s important to note that Obama will use the eve of 9/11 (the World Trade Center attack and the Benghazi murders) to create an imagery and recount emotions meant to sway Congress.

As he feigns outrage, his argument for intervention is weak and this nation does not need to be thrown into the crucible he created.

While battling for reelection in August of 2012, he drew a “red line”.  Saying now, “I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line,” is his desperate attempt to rescue his personal credibility from his hubristic foolishness.

See also:  A Nation Commits Suicide

Connect the Dots: Operation Penetrate – Part Two

Before we go further, I think it would be prudent to provide a brief explanation as to just who some of these terrorist organizations and terrorist sympathizers are.

AL QAEDA: Al Qaeda is a global militant Islamic terrorist organization founded by Osama bin Laden in 1988/1989. Al Qaeda calls for a global Islamic jihad and is best known for its attacks on America on September 11, 2001. It has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union and NATO as well as various other countries. (Source)

Al SHABAAB: Also known as Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen (HSM), Al Shabaab is a militant Islamic organization that has been attempting to overthrow the government of Somalia. In November 2009, Al Shabaab established an Al Quds Brigade, a paramilitary unit created specifically for attacking Israel and Jewish interests in Africa. In 2010, Al Shabaab announced that it maintained strong ties with Al Qaeda. They are probably best known for their attack on Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard due to his satirical cartoons featuring Mohammed. Al Shabaab has been designated a terrorist organization by Australia, Canada, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. (Source)

HAMAS: Hamas was founded in 1987 as an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. According to it’s charter, Hamas exists to establish an Islamic state in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Hamas is known to use violence against U.S. interests in the Middle East and on American soil. Hamas has received support from Iran and collaborates with the terrorist group Hezbollah. Hamas was designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department in 1993. (Source)

HEZBOLLAH: Also known as the “Party of god”, Hezbollah receives training, weapons and financial support from Iran and Syria. Several countries have classified Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, and it was designated as such by the United States in 1999. (Source)

THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD: Founded in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood claims to be a non-religious political party. It’s stated goals include the instillation of the Koran and the Sunnah as the “sole reference point for ordering the life of the Muslim family, individual, community and state.” This includes the enforcement of Shariah law, the re-establishment of the Caliphate, and imposing the jizya tax on all non-Muslims in exchange for protection from the state. Its slogan is “Islam is the solution.” All of the 9/11 hijackers were associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, and the current leader of Al Qaeda was arrested in the 1980’s due to his involvement with Muslim Brotherhood terrorist activities. The Muslim Brotherhood maintains a presence in Bahrain, Syria, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yeman, Algeria, Sudan, Somalia, Tunisia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In spite of its documented terrorist activities and close ties with known terrorist organizations, the Muslim Brotherhood has not been designated a terrorist organization. (Source) (Source) (Source)

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR): CAIR is a pro-Islamic advocacy group founded in 1994 by Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad, and Rafeeq Jaber, three officials of the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP), an organization described as having intimate ties with the terror group Hamas. CAIR is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has regional offices nationwide. In 2007 CAIR was named by federal prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorist funding investigation. In 2008, FBI Special Agent Lara Burns stated that CAIR was “a front group for Hamas, and in 2009  FBI headquarters issued a mandate to all FBI field offices to sever all ties with CAIR as a result of CAIR’s ties with Hamas.

Continue Reading Here

Connect the Dots: Operation Penetrate – Part One

I really enjoyed the Mel Gibson film Conspiracy Theory. In fact, I love conspiracies altogether. Not that I believe them, but they are fun. One of the things that I find fascinating about them is that in any good conspiracy, there is at least a grain of truth. I would even go so far to say that in any good conspiracy, the facts are almost always true or at least a good percentage of them. The problem does not lie in the facts surrounding the conspiracy, but in the conclusion, the interpretation of those facts.

Of course, the facts must be pertinent to the conspiracy; otherwise the conclusion / conspiracy will sound completely ridiculous regardless of the truth of the facts surrounding it. One can say that the former logo used by Procter & Gamble featured what appeared to be rams horns, and that the logo also featured a male face that was attached to the rams horns, and the numbers 666 appear throughout the logo and that the logo also featured 13 stars. All of this is true – at least to some extent. The conclusion based on these facts, however, was that since the number 666 is the number of Satan, and that the devil has rams horns and that the number 13 is also a satanic number – then obviously Procter & Gamble is a satanic organization. The problem with this is that it is all hogwash. The so-called ram’s horns are actually the moon, and the face is that of the man in the moon, and the 666 that is seen is merely curls in the hair and beard of the man in the moon. But you can see where conspiracies must have actual documented facts that are pertinent to the conclusion in order to be even remotely believable. One must be able to connect the dots so to speak, and the dots must follow a logical progression in order to arrive at a reasonable conclusion. Whether or not that conclusion is true is another matter.

Now that’s one heck of a prologue isn’t it! So, with that all being said, I will now present a group of facts that I have noticed over the past several months while surfing the web. I will not present a final conclusion based on this group of facts, however. I will leave that up to the reader (and no, the images appearing in this article are not a conclusion, they are merely satirical in nature, so don’t draw any conclusions based on them. Draw your conclusions only on the facts presented). But I would be interested to see if these are all just random facts that do not lead to any conclusion, or if there is something really here. If the following facts really were part of a conspiracy (as opposed to nothing more than completely random unconnected facts and incidents) then I would call this (non) conspiracy:

“After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, we learned that our immigration system had been used by foreign terrorists to gain a safe haven in the United States. All of the 9/11 hijackers received visas to come to the U.S. And once they were here, all but one of the 9/11 hijackers acquired some form of a U.S. identification document. These forms of ID helped them board commercial flights on 9/11.” – Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) (Source)

“The southern border is porous, and we need to shut it down if we hope to get ahead of the problems that illegal immigration brings, …Less than 5 percent of the 125,000 containers coming into this country each day are ever inspected.” – Joe M. Allbaugh, former FEMA Director  (Source)

In February 2011, the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report which states that of the 1,969 mile border with Mexico, only 873 have been deemed secure according to the standards of the Department of Homeland Security. (Source)

There is little doubt that the federal government has either created a porous border (overtly or covertly), or has been ineffectual in creating a secure border (either overtly or covertly). Even the director of the FBI, Robert Mueller has stated that we “live in a world where borders and boundaries are increasingly irrelevant.” (Source)

That the federal government has allowed such a porous border, and that FBI Director Mueller considers borders irrelevant is cause for concern, especially in light of known anti-America terrorist groups operating in Canada and Mexico. It has been speculated that there are more international terrorist organizations active in Canada than anywhere else in the world. Groups such as Al Qaeda, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Armed Islamic Group (GIA) and the Egyptian Islamic Jihad group are all suspected of operating in Canada. (Source). Rep. John Culbertson of Texas has stated that Mexico is home to Al Qaeda training camps (Source), and there is evidence that both Hezbollah and Iran have a strong presence in Mexico as well. (Source). Hezbollah has even gone so far as to brag about waging war on the United States, yet for some reason, the American government seems to be ignoring this. (Source)

Continue Reading Here